The relationship between the United States and China has become a focal point of global attention, not only for policymakers but also for scholars and analysts attempting to decipher the complex nature of their interaction. Central to many discussions is the concept popularly known as the “Thucydides Trap,” a historical analogy derived from ancient Greek history that describes the potential inevitability of conflict between a rising power and an established hegemon. While this concept offers a useful lens through which to view the US-China relationship, applying it to the modern geopolitical landscape demands careful consideration of its limitations, contextual distinctions, and the broader array of factors influencing both nations.
The origin of the “Thucydides Trap” lies in the account provided by the ancient Athenian historian Thucydides regarding the Peloponnesian War, fought in the 5th century BCE between Athens and Sparta. Thucydides pointed out that the root cause of the war was the anxiety provoked in Sparta by the rapid rise of Athens. More specifically, Sparta’s fear of losing dominance was the spark for conflict. This dynamic—where the fear caused by a rising power’s ascent leads to war—is what contemporary political scientist Graham Allison distilled into the “Thucydides Trap” concept. In his influential 2017 book, *Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?*, Allison posits that this historical pattern is repeating itself as China’s growing economic, military, and geopolitical strength challenges American preeminence. The implication is that the likelihood of conflict escalates when a rising power threatens to displace an established one, raising the stakes for both countries.
However, this analogy is far from uncontested. Critics argue that the Thucydides Trap oversimplifies the intricate, multi-dimensional nature of current US-China relations. Unlike the relatively straightforward interstate rivalry of ancient Greece, today’s global order is characterized by economic interdependence, overlapping institutional frameworks, and diplomatic engagement that complicate predictions of inevitable conflict. The original Thucydides text itself has been scrutinized; some scholars suggest it was mistranslated or that the narrative overemphasizes fear as the unique driver of war, sidelining political, economic, and social nuances. Applying this framework to the modern era without accounting for these complexities risks ignoring critical distinctions and stereotyping the relationship as inevitably adversarial.
Exploring the core arguments for the Thucydides Trap reveals structural tensions as its backbone. China’s impressive economic development, military modernization, and assertive foreign policy posture signify a rising power whose surge disrupts the existing global hierarchy dominated by the United States. Manifestations of this dynamic appear in various domains: military maneuvers and increased US naval presence in the Asia-Pacific, economic friction shown in trade wars and tariff battles, and competition in emerging technologies like 5G and artificial intelligence. Such developments cultivate suspicion and anxiety on both sides, elevating the risk of miscalculations that could spiral into conflict. These indicators reinforce the narrative of a classical power transition fraught with instability.
Despite these tensions, both powers actively seek paths to mitigate conflict, reminding us that the Thucydides Trap is neither a prophecy nor an absolute rule. Chinese President Xi Jinping has publicly dismissed the notion that war between China and the US is unavoidable, emphasizing themes of peaceful coexistence and cooperation. Similarly, many strategic thinkers urge diplomatic engagement, confidence-building initiatives, and deeper economic ties as buffers against confrontation. The globalized and interconnected nature of the 21st century adds unique incentives to manage rivalry constructively. Unlike the ancient world, today’s powers are embedded in a matrix of international organizations, global supply chains, and mutual dependencies that encourage restraint and dialogue over open warfare.
Adding another layer of complexity is the question of role reversal compared to the original analogy. In the Peloponnesian War, Sparta—the established power—feared the rising Athens. Yet in the US-China context, the parallels are not perfectly aligned, with arguments suggesting both powers occupy ambiguous or evolving roles. Moreover, contemporary conflict dynamics cannot overlook developments like nuclear deterrence, multilateral alliances, and global media’s role in shaping perceptions and public opinion. Observers caution that framing US-China relations purely through the binary lens of the Thucydides Trap risks promoting adversarial mindsets that limit strategic creativity and options for peaceful coexistence.
Finally, internal political factors and leadership decisions profoundly shape external policies. Both countries face domestic pressures that may harden their stances or push for aggressive posturing. In the United States, political polarization and election cycles add volatility, while China grapples with socio-economic challenges and nationalistic sentiment. These domestic contexts often amplify the psychological elements—fear, ambition, distrust—that feed into the power transition narrative. Understanding these internal dynamics is crucial to appreciating why tensions might escalate and also how diplomatic openings could emerge.
In sum, while the Thucydides Trap provides a compelling historical analogy that draws attention to the dangers inherent in the rise of China and the relative decline of American dominance, it is not a deterministic script for inevitable conflict. The US-China relationship today is shaped by a myriad of factors including economic interdependence, global governance institutions, strategic calculations, leadership choices, and domestic politics. Recognizing these subtleties moves dialogue beyond zero-sum thinking and opens space for intentional strategies aimed at peaceful coexistence. As these two global powers navigate rivalry and cooperation, the challenge lies in escaping the trap rather than succumbing to it. History serves as both a warning and guide, urging mutual understanding, restraint, and adaptability in forging a stable international order that accommodates shifts in power without catastrophe. Whether the United States and China will rewrite the script of their power transition remains one of the most significant geopolitical questions of our era.
发表回复